|
Post by ScytaleIRAx on Jul 17, 2008 19:05:37 GMT -5
woot we win! with a sweeping plurality too!
|
|
|
Post by FinalLegacy on Jul 18, 2008 9:49:08 GMT -5
ur lucky u didnt put my name on the poll like on the other topic ;D
|
|
|
Post by Royce13 on Jul 18, 2008 22:43:52 GMT -5
ok making a new topic Royce Vs Final GO GO GO
|
|
|
Post by FinalLegacy on Jul 19, 2008 18:07:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Royce13 on Jul 20, 2008 12:31:10 GMT -5
note to self make 100 accounts under different names and vote for me... opps did i say that out loud?
|
|
|
Post by FinalLegacy on Jul 20, 2008 21:31:28 GMT -5
err ... no you just typed it out loud
|
|
|
Post by ScytaleIRAx on Jul 24, 2008 21:43:53 GMT -5
nah royce is strange like that, he probably also said it. part of why science is better than him lol.
|
|
Asakari
Skirmisher
Schwartzvald...
Posts: 50
|
Post by Asakari on Jul 24, 2008 22:18:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Royce13 on Jul 25, 2008 12:36:08 GMT -5
Ok someone make a new topic Royce Vs Science right now its a tie
|
|
|
Post by TLI-Inferno on Jan 24, 2009 21:13:36 GMT -5
this is a very interesting story. i will not vote for any of the above, however, for i believe that all 3 can comply together. god is what is left over when science cannot explain any of what is left. that is where you find god, he is the unproven, but existing...and royce, hes just some guy mixed in with it all, nobody cares about poor royce...except for the ppl who do :/
|
|
|
Post by Royce13 on Jan 24, 2009 22:32:04 GMT -5
ya that damn royce he needs to learn something from all this
|
|
|
Post by FinalLegacy on Jan 25, 2009 10:08:12 GMT -5
i think i voted on royce a while ago... probalby just because id feel sorry for him if he'd stay on 0% and ppl would laugh at him
|
|
|
Post by omgtangerines on Feb 5, 2009 19:29:43 GMT -5
There is one problem with the struggle between science and God. If you were to perform intercranial surgery on the professor, you could see his brain. You could feel it, touch it, smell it, taste it. However, religion does not give us a place to cut to see God. It replies with the simple reply of "I have faith" to whatever charge is leveled against it. In any debate, if you simply say, "I have faith" you will lose the debate.
Why, then, does religion still exist?
|
|
|
Post by Royce13 on Feb 6, 2009 8:36:11 GMT -5
There is one problem with the struggle between science and God. If you were to perform intercranial surgery on the professor, you could see his brain. You could feel it, touch it, smell it, taste it. However, religion does not give us a place to cut to see God. It replies with the simple reply of "I have faith" to whatever charge is leveled against it. In any debate, if you simply say, "I have faith" you will lose the debate. Why, then, does religion still exist? You asked the wrong question. I have my religion and that religion has me believe in God. Your religion has you believe in no god at all. That religion is called atheistism. In a way you even you have a religion, so religion does still exist one way or the other.
|
|
|
Post by Setokaiva on Feb 7, 2009 15:59:34 GMT -5
Wrong. Atheism is the absence of a religion, because it follows *no* god or gods whatsoever. A religion must follow at least one deity, spirit, or whatever, or it can't be called a religion. So atheism isn't a religion in its own right, just the absence of one.
|
|